paper no: 205 cultural studies
Name : kumarkhaniya diya g.
Function :
M. A (English) Sem : 3
Paper :(205) cultural studies
Topic :
Limitations of cultural studies
Four goals of cultural studies
Any one Type of cultural studies.
➡️What is Cultural Studies?
‘Culture’ word itself is hard to define.
‘Cultural Studies’ is loosely a group of tendencies, issues and questions arising from a social turmoil of the 1960s.
It is composed of elements of
Marxism,
Post-Structuralism,
Post-Modernism,
Feminism,
Gender studies,
Anthropology,
Race,
Sociology,
Ethnic Studies,
Film theory,
Urban Studies,
Public Policy,
Post-Colonial Studies,
Popular Cultural Studies
-and those fields which concentrates on social and cultural forces that either create community or cause division or alienation.
Later on discipline of Psychology has also arrived in Cultural Studies.
It is to erase boundaries between 1. High-Low, 2. Classic-Popular literary texts and 3. Literature-Other Cultural Discourses.
As we know that Cultural Study refers many of the disciplines, it is natural that it will have limitations. We know that if we concentrate on more than one work at a time, we could not give every work the same importance and attention. Here, it happens with Cultural Studies too.
➡️Let’s see which its limitations are.
1. Diversity of approach and subject-matter:
The weakness of Cultural Studies lies in its strengths, particularly its emphasis upon diversity of approach and subject matter. Cultural Studies can at times seem merely an intellectual smorgasbordin which the critic blithely combines artful helping of texts and objects and then “finds” deep connections between them, without adequately researching what a culture means or how cultures have interacted.
2. Not fueled by hard research:
Cultural Studies are not always fueled by hard researches.
i.e., Historians have traditionally practiced to analyze ‘culture’. Which includes scientifically collected data.
3.Lack of Knowledge:
Cultural Study practitioners often know a lot of interesting things and possess the intellectual ability to play them off interestingly against each other, but they sometimes lack adequate knowledge of “deep play” of meanings or “thick description” of a culture that ethnographer Clifford Geertz identified in his studies of the Balinese.
In the essay of Geertz uses “deep play” word for the ‘cockfight’ which is illegal in his society. He explains as a context of British philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), who defines “deep play” as a game with risks high that no rational person would engage in it. The amounts of money involved in the cockfight makes Balinese cockfight “deep play”.
And another words “thick description” is used in the field of anthropology, sociology, religious studies and human and organizational development. The “thick description” of culture means it’s not just explaining what culture is but also refers that in which context the meaning is developed.
4. Necessity of reading the classics:
Sometimes students complain that professors who overemphasize cultural studies tend to downplay the necessity of reading the classics, and that they sometimes coerce students into “politically correct” views.
5. Whatever is happening at the moment:
David Richterdescribes culture as
“-about whatever is happening at the moment, rather than about a body of texts created in the past.
‘Happening’ topics, generally speaking, are the mass media themselves, which, in a postmodern culture, dominate the culture lives on its inhabitants, or topics that have been valorizes by the mass media.”
But he goes on to observe that if this seems trivial, the strength of cultural studies its “relentlessly critical attitude toward journalism, publishing, cinema, television, and other forms of mass media, whose seemingly transparent windows through which we view ‘reality’ probably constitute the most blatant and pervasive mode of false consciousness of our era” (Richter 1218).
6. Tempted to dismiss popular culture:
If we are tempted to dismiss popular culture, it is also worth remembering that when the works like Hamlet or Huckleberry Finn were written, they were not intended for elite discussions in English classrooms, but exactly for popular consumption.
7. ‘Culture Wars’ of academia:
Defenders of tradition and advocates of cultural studies are waging what is sometimes called the “culture wars”of academia.
On the one hand are offered impassioned defenses of humanism as the foundation, since the time of the ancient Greeks, of Western civilization and modern democracy.
On the other hand, as Marxist theorist Terry Eagleton has written, the current “crises” in the humanities can be seen as failure of the humanities; this “body of discourses” about “imperishable” values has demonstrably negated(cancelled) those very values in its practices.
Conclusion:
Whatever the emphasis, cultural studies makes available one more approach-and several methodologies-to address these questions.
➡️Four goals of cultural studies:-
Four Goals of Cultural Studies
‘Culture’ is a term which has may connotations cultural is refinement or development of mind tastes, etc. by education, training and experience. It is a form of civilization. It can be called an advance development of the human power. Also culture is an evidence of intellectual development in a particular nation. The meaning and context of culture differs from country to country and person to person.
A college class on the American novel is reading a famous book of Allice Walker called. The Colour purple (1982). In the classroom the professor identifies African American literacy and cultural sources and then he describers the book’s multilayered narrative structure. Also the professor gave a brief review of its feminist critique of American gender and racial attitudes. Films and novels of different countries show their varied culture even gestures differ from culture.
ORIGIN :
‘Culture’, derives from ‘Cultura’ and ‘colere’ meaning ‘to cultivate’. It also meant ‘to honour’ and ‘project’ by the 19th century in Europe it tastes of the upper class (elite).
‘culture’ is the mode of producing meaning and ideas. This ‘mode’ is a negotiation over which meanings are valid. Elite culture controls meanings because it controls the terms of the debate.
Culture studies looks at marker popular culture and everyday life. Popular culture is the culture of masses. A culture study argues that culture is about the meanings a community or society generates. A cultural study believes that the ‘culture’ of a community includes various aspects: economic, spatial, ideological, erotic and political. Culture is not a natural thing it is produced, cultural studies is interested in production and consumption of culture. Emphasis on discourse and totality are at centre to cultural studies. It believes that we cannot ‘read’ cultural artifacts only within the esthetic realm.
Stuart Hall’s work has been a trendsetter in cultural studies and inaugurated the field in Britain. Hall’s essay of ‘encoding’ and Decoding ‘set the scene’ for cultural studies of the media. The essay argued about meaning within the texts – songs, painting, TV soaps takes helps of codes to organize. ‘Culture’ which makes a society “a cultured society”.
Margaret Mead: “Culture is the learned behavior of society or a subgroup.”
Clifford Geertz : “Culture is simply ensemble of stories we tell ourselves about ourselves.”
The tone of this early version of cultural studies was set by students if the British New left, especially Richard Hoggart and Raymond Williams.
What cultural studies does is to interpret sings of culture such as the ones listed above as part of a power struggle to acquire, maintain or contest meanings. The ‘Critique’ component of cultural studies explores the political significance of the signs of signs as what they mask or gloss, what they refinance, cultural studies, studies the language in and through which meanings are made in a particular culture. Cultural studies questions how such meaning reflect the power struggle within that culture studies explores how certain meanings are privileged in that culture at the cost of others.
“A cultural study is the analysis of cultures systems of meaning – production and consumption.”
Steven spielber’s movies and opera Winfred show point out, examine inter-relationship among – race, gender, popular culture, the media, and literature. The director and anchor, both of them question cultural conventions. Historical and contemporary aspects are on the oprah Winfred show, in Hollywood films. The TV Programmers in our country also presents various cultures. Gujarati, Bengali and Rajasthan TV soaps on channels are famous now a days. Such movies also run well in theatres for long time.
Elaine Showalter in her essay on feminism talks about the different cultures and contexts. She talks about American culture as well as French culture. Ronald Barlher, Claude Levi-Straurs, Jacuque Derride and Michel Foucault all had to say one or the other thing about culture in their critical essay. A culture study has connection with maxims, the new historicism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, popular culture and postcolonial studies.
➡️Cultural Studies approaches share four goals :
(1) Cultural Studies transcends the confiner of a particular discipline such as literacy criticism or history.
(2) Cultural studies are politically engaged.
(3) Cultural studies deny the separation of ‘high’ and ‘low’ are elite and popular culture.
(4) Cultural studies analyze not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.
(1) Cultural Studies transcends the confiner of a particular discipline such as literacy criticism or history.
A cultural study is practiced in such journals as critical Inquiry, Representation and boundary. Italian Opera, a Latino ‘telenovela’ the architectural styles of prisons, body piercing – and drawing conclusion about the changes in textual phenomena over time-such things are found in these kinds of newspapers cultural studies not simply or essentially about literature in the traditional sense or even about “Art”. Lawrence Grosberg, cary Nelson, and Paula. Trencher stress that the intellectual promise of cultural studies lies in its attempts to “cut across diverse social and political interests and address many of the struggles within the current scene.” Intellectual works are not limited by their “borders” as single text, historical problems or disciplines, and the critical own personal connections to what is analyzed and described. Henry Giroux and others write in their “Dalhousie Revise” manifesto that cultural studies practitioners are ‘resisting intellectuals’ who see what they do as “an emancipator project” as it erodes the traditional disciplinary divisions in most institutions of higher educational. For students, this sometimes means that a professor might make his or his own political view part of the instruction, which of course, can lead to problems. But this kind of criticism, like feminism, is an engaged rather than a detached activity.
(2) Cultural Studies is politically engaged:
The cultural critics see themselves as “Oppositional” not only within their own discipliner but to many of the power structures of society at large. The cultural critics question inequalities within power structures and try to find out the models for restructuring relationships among the dominant and “minority” of “Subaltern” discourses. The meaning and individual subjectivity are culturally constructed, they can thus be reconstructed. This type of idea, taken to a Philosophical extreme, demise the autonomy of the individual whether an actual person or a character in literature, a rebuttal of the traditional humanistic “Great man” or “Great Book” theory and a relocation of esthetics and culture from the ideal realsm of taste and sensibility into the arena of a whole society’s everyday life as it is constructed.
(3) Cultural studies demise the separation of ‘high’ and ‘low’ or elite and popular culture.
In these days cultural critics work to transfer the term culture to include mass culture, whether popular, folk, or urban. Jean Belldrillard, Andreas Huyssen and some other critics of cultural studies argue that after World War II the distinction among high low and mass culture collapsed. They look forward on other theorists like pierre Bourdieu and Dick Hebdige on how “good taste often only reflects prevailing social, economic and political power bases.”
For example, the images of India that were circulated during the colonial rule of British ray by writes like Rudyard Kipling seem innocent, but reveal and entrenched imperialist argument for white superiority and worldwide domination of white superiority and world wide domination of other races, especially Asians wherever British or French or any other whoever ruled the colonist tried to show their culture superior. But race along was not the issue for the British raj: money was also another determining factor. Thus, drawing also upon the ideas of French Gistorian Michel de Certeam, cultural critics examine.
“The practice of everyday life”, studying literature as an anthropologist would, as a phenomenon of culture, including a culture’s economy. Cultural critics describe ‘what’ is produced and how various productions relate to one another. They do not determine to find out which one is the best work. Their aim is to reveal the political economic reasons ‘why’ a certain cultural product is more valued at certain times than others.
Changing of boundaries among disciplines high and low can make cultural studies just plain fun. Some of these examples are the given titles.
The birth of captain Jach Sparrow :
An Analysis
Disney’s pirates of the Caribbean: The curse o the Blach Pearl (2003)
R.L. Stevenson’s long John Silver in ‘Treasure Island’ (1881)
Keith Richard’s eye makeup.
(4) Cultural studies analyses not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.
Marxist critics have recognized the importance of such par literary questions such as –
‘Who supports a given artist?’
‘Who publishes his or her books, and how are these books distributed’?
Who buys books?
For that matter, who is literate and who is not?
A well-known analysis of literary production is Janice Radway’s study of the America romance (novel) and its readers, “Reading the Romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature, which demonstrates the textual effects of the publishing industry’s decisions effects of the publishing industry’s decisions about books that will reduce its financial risks.”
Another contribution is the collection ‘Reading in America which is edited by Cathy N. Davidson, which includes essays on literacy and gender in colonial New England, urban magazine audiences in eighteenth – century New York city, the impact upon reading of such technical immolation as cheaper eyeglasses, electric lights, and trains, the book – of the month club and how written and texts go through fluctuations of popularity and canonicity. Thus we can say that literature is not separate from our past, present and future.’
Cultural studies joins subjectivity means culture in relation to individual lives with ‘engagement’ a direct approach to attacking social malpractices. The practitioners of cultural studies deny ‘humanism’ or ‘the humanities’ as universal categories. The practioners strive for what they might call ‘social - reason’, which often resemble the goals and values of humanistic and democratic ideals.
Now, let us see what difference does a cultural studies approach make for the student? First of all, it is increasingly clear that by the year 2050 the United States would be what demographers call a majority minority population; by this one has to understand that the present numerical majority of ‘white’, ‘Caucasian’ and Anglo will be the minority Americans, particularly with the dramatically increasing numbers of Latina residents, mostly Mexican ameucans.
Gerald Graff and James Phelan absolve, “It is a common prediction that the culture of the next century will put a premium on people’s ability to deal productively with conflict and cultural difference, learning by controversy is sound training for citizenship in that future.”
To the enquiry “why teach the controversy?” they noted that today a student can go from one class in which the values of western culture are never questioned to the next class where western culture is portrayed as hope lessee compromised by racism, sexism and homophobia; professors can acknowledge these difference and encourage students to contract a conversation for themselves as “the most exciting part of their education.”
Above discussed are the four goals of cultural studies. Also a cultural study is divided into five parts. The first part deals with British cultural materialism where British culture and the writes and theorize are discussed. The second one in New Historicism. It discusses various historical novels with a new approach. In the discusses ‘Laputa’ is given more space and with it feminism is appropriately discussed. The third one is American multiculturalism. Here, various cultures and their works on widely discussed. American condiment has mar countries and of course they were European colonies in the past. The culture of Mexicans red Indians and ‘white’ are presented with their mode of writers. This writer write about the way they were treated in past, the way they fought for the rights and the way they live theirs life or is Asian American writers. These, writers are migrates from Asian – sub – continent. The fourth one is postmodernism and popular culture. This part wildly discuss the term postmodernism, how the writers apply this terms – ‘the fifth is postcolonial studies’.
Through the study of various one becom
es a better person with his whole heart.
➡️ The type of culture :
➡️give one type of culture studies :-
Introduction
Cultural materialism in literary theory and cultural studies traces its origin to the work of the left-wing literary critic Raymond Williams. Cultural materialism espouses analysis based on critical theory, in the tradition of the Frankfurt School. Key Words: A Journal of Cultural Materialism is dedicated to developing the field, and has been published by the Raymond Williams Society since 1998.
Cultural materialism emerged as a theoretical movement in the early 1980s along with new historicism, an American approach to early modern literature, with which it shares common ground. The term was coined by Williams, who used it to describe a theoretical blending of leftist culturalism and Marxist analysis. Cultural materialists deal with specific historical documents and attempt to analyze and recreate the zeitgeist of a particular moment in history.
Williams viewed culture as a "productive process", part of the means of production, and cultural materialism often identifies what he called "residual", "emergent" and "oppositional" cultural elements. Following in the tradition of Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci and others, cultural materialists extend the class-based analysis of traditional Marxism (Neo-Marxism) by means of an additional focus on the marginalized.
Cultural materialists analyze the processes by which hegemonic forces in society appropriate canonical and historically important texts, such as Shakespeare and Austen, and utilize them in an attempt to validate or inscribe certain values on the cultural imaginary. Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, authors of Political Shakespeare, have had considerable influence in the development of this movement and their book is considered to be a seminal text. They have identified four defining characteristics of cultural materialism as a theoretical device:
➡️Historical context
➡️Close textual analysis
➡️Political commitment
➡️Theoretical method
Cultural materialists seek to draw attention to the processes being employed by contemporary power structures, such as the church, the state or the academy, to disseminate ideology. To do this they explore a text’s historical context and its political implications, and then through close textual analysis note the dominant hegemonic position. They identify possibilities for the rejection and/or subversion of that position. British critic Graham Holderness defines cultural materialism as a "politicized form of historiography".
Through its insistence on the importance of an engagement with issues of gender, sexuality, race and class, cultural materialism has had a significant impact on the field of literary studies, especially in Britain. Cultural materialists have found the area of Renaissance studies particularly receptive to this type of analysis. Traditional humanist readings often eschewed consideration of the oppressed and marginalized in textual readings, whereas cultural materialists routinely consider such groups in their engagement with literary texts, thus opening new avenues of approach to issues of representation in the field of literary criticism.
Culture as way of living life a particular group of people.
Traditions, rules- regulation, customs, food, art, festival, clothes, norms, religious, rituals, communists, civilizations etc has all about culture.
In many parts of the word 'cultural studies' (CS) has been moving into the mainstream of intellectual life, offering scholars interested in society and culture alternatives to old research paradigms at culture.
In cultural studies emerged work done at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, how this five terms as part to cultural studies. Now explain to British cultural materialism.
British Cultural Materialism is a critical, Marxist-inspired theory of culture and literature that emerged in Britain during the 1980s (grounded in the foundational work of Raymond Williams and popularized in Renaissance studies by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield). It argues that art, literature, and institutions are not neutral or timeless, but are material products shaped by historical, social, and political power structures.
Brian Friel’s Translations: Confrontation of British Cultural Materialism with Cultural
Authors
From the very beginning of the formation of communities people shared, at least, one common base, within that they could help them live peacefully and communicate safely and continue their lives. Culture is ubiquitous to affect human life, but cultural materialism always tends to change and adjust itself with its malevolent purposes. British cultural materialism, as one form of cultural materialism during history, affected many communities, such as those of Ireland, India, etc. to spread its territory of imperialism, but the targeted communities always confronted with effects of imperialism in different ways. Intellectuals, as an engine to these movements, have always played an important role. One of these contemporary intellectuals is Brian Friel, the Irish writer.
Raymond Williams, cultural materialism and the break-up of Britain
Abstract
This thesis re-examines the writing of Raymond Williams. It has two goals. Firstly, it explores Williams's concept of cultural materialism, which theorises the role played by cultural forms in the creation and contestation of a national political order. Secondly, it extrapolates Williams's implicit critique of the unitary British state, and his theory of how cultural forms relate to that state.
In Chapter One, I argue that Williams developed his theory of culture by combining a theoretical critique of national literary traditions with an interest in the emergent drama of nineteenth-century Scandinavia and twentieth-century Ireland and Wales. This theme is developed in Chapter Two, where I suggest that certain cultural and political experiences in Wales helped Williams to develop a cultural theory that was more generally applicable.
Central to Williams's political aspirations was an attempt to expand and democratise the education system. In Chapter Three, I argue that Williams's novels can be understood as university fiction, providing examples of the kind of university he wished to develop. Since universities arose as institutions generating a sense of unified national culture during the imperial period, to re-think the work of the university is also to re-think the political make-up of the nation.
This theme is expanded in Chapter Four, where I argue that Williams related the break-up of the British empire to the break-up of the British state, via devolution in Scotland and Wales. Williams theorised the part played by fiction and other cultural forms in enabling those nations to develop their own voices. He also showed that fiction could provide an imaginative critique of the unitary British state from a series of other perspectives, notably feminism and ethnic subcultures. Finally, in Chapter Five I argue that Raymond Williams can be understood as a film theorist, and demonstrate that a similar renegotiation of British identities occurs in contemporary film.
An interest in the political make-up of the British state, and an attempt to develop alternative political and cultural formations, spanned Williams's career. This aspect of his work has hitherto received little critical attention. By discussing Williams in relation to the political break-up of Britain, this thesis makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the Williams oeuvre.
Conclusion
We know that not only British culture but Indian politics, social, economic, anti-racist, religious, Marxist has to cultural materialism.
This kind of culture has goes on happing in society and endless culture to British and all other culture. This culture included the rapid expansion of mass consumption and mass society & the proliferation of means of mass communication.
So we know that in British culture has connected to other culture and Brittan at center in world for materialism.
.....................
